Today we took a 75 point test on Chapters 9 through 12 from our textbook. Then we watched a documentary called "A White Man's Democracy". The main focus of this documentary is on Andrew Jackson. We got mostly through Question 7 on the worksheet.
As more economic opportunities became available to more people, everyday citizens saw the need to have more say in the government. They saw the link between economic opportunities and political power, so there was a great surge in participation in government. Jacksonian Democracy appealed to the common, everyday American.
Andrew Jackson reflected the vitality and irascibility of the common man. He was masculine, rough, rugged, and a successful military man. His rough childhood and lack of formal schooling or military training made more people relate with him, made him appear less threatening, and made him seem like an underdog. The Panic of 1819 also made people very distrustful of rich people.
However, Andrew Jackson did not appeal to everyone. His reputation for violent outbursts, his obsession with honor and revenge, and his multitude of duels alarmed people. People were actually very scared of him because of his temperament and actions.
Andrew Jackson was a contradictory man. On one hand, he held a lifelong suspicion of the rich and wealthy, but also proudly displayed his own wealth. As a believer in equality and freedom, he was one of the biggest slaveholders in Tennessee. He demanded deference, yet was unwilling to defer to the elites, who he thought had looked down on him his whole life.
Although both Democratic Republicans, Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson had differing views on what a democracy should look like. In a Jeffersonian Democracy, the average man would choose leaders, but would not become representatives themselves. The leaders would be chosen from a pool of educated aristocrats. In a Jacksonian Democracy, however, the role of the electorate was to choose, as well as produce, leaders.
The Corrupt Bargain took place during the Election of 1824. The election was between Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, William Crawford, and Henry Clay. Although Andrew Jackson won the most electoral votes out of the four candidates, he did not win the majority, so the vote went to the House of Representatives with just the top three candidates. Out of the running, Henry Clay threw his support behind John Quincy Adams, who then won the election. In the new Adams administration, Henry Clay was named Secretary of State. Andrew Jackson was furious at this and believed a deal between Clay and Adams had taken place. There is no evidence of such a deal, but the events do point to a possible deal between the two men.
The 1828 presidential election between John Quincy Adams, running for a second term, and Andrew Jackson was a very nasty one. Supporters on both sides tried to sully their opponent's name. John Quincy Adams was accused by Jackson's supporters of corruption, pimping, and supporting special interests. Jackson, on the other hand, was called a vigilante, an unprincipled adulterer, a dueler, and a bastard son of a prostitute by the National Republicans, Adams' supporters.
Unfortunately for the National Republicans, their strategy backfired and helped Jackson's campaign instead of hurt it. By emphasizing his fiery, iconoclastic nature, they made it easier for the people to relate with Jackson and see him as one of their own.
Hey Kathy! Thanks so much for posting this. Even though I was in class, I feel like there's always something I miss, and you wrote so much down, it was super helpful!
ReplyDeleteWhat you said about Andrew Jackson not appealing to everyone is important. Mr. Stewart touched on this a little in class, but it's really important to remember that figures in history are made out to be perfect. But there were large groups of people who really didn't like Jackson, namely because he was so "common." We talked about this more on Friday, that Jackson was too violent and independent for a lot of the Adams supporters. We can see this in the nullification crisis when Jackson says he wants to hang Calhoun for wanting to nullify to the tariffs. I found I quote that I thought was really funny (though I don't know how reliable it is) that properly demonstrates Jackson's violent tendencies and absolute requirement for loyalty. He said to Calhoun, "John Calhoun, if you secede from my nation I will secede your head from the rest of your body."
http://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/159502.Andrew_Jackson
Similar to Julia, I just wanted to say that I absolutely love your posts from the week Kathy! I found it very helpful, and I added many of your points to my own notes on my google doc. Thanks so much for your daily updates!
ReplyDeleteI thought it was really fun starting to learn more about Andrew Jackson because my old history teacher from Blach had a HUGE "historical crush" on him. I remember watching this Andrew Jackson crash course then which I wanted to put on your post here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beN4qE-e5O8
I agree, once again, with Julia about the fact that Jackson was a very controversial and contradictory figure. Looking back on it now, people find him pretty, as Mr. Stewart put it, "rough, rugged and raw." Though he is now viewed with admiration because we do tend to look up to the more rebellious characters, he really came up at the right time in history. People really were looking for a president that represented them more, and he popped up right then and there as somebody that lived and breathed that persona for them. Granted, he was an extreme embodiment of that "common man" in mentality but not in action.
As such, there is actually an article I found of Jackson where the author wants to have Andrew Jackson "vilified" for the murder of many Natives during his presidency. See the article here:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/03/andrew_jackson_should_be_kicked_off_the_20_bill_he_ordered_a_genocide.html
It just goes to show that Andrew Jackson is even today a contradictory person!
Thanks again Kathy for your posts this past week!